Home > Entity Framework > Entity Framework Join Include Not Working

Entity Framework Join Include Not Working

Contents

I agree that the whole problem is because anonymous type that you use in your query. Thus Include() is no longer applicable, and it is silently dropped.   Since you are using LINQ to Entities, you don’t need Include() at all. What are some ways that fast, long-distance communications can exist without needing to have electronic radios? Is there a way to block an elected President from entering office? his comment is here

Is that correct? then i can print out the contents of the UserResource collection for a Resource.   If i try a join, it does not include the UserResource items ....               IQueryable Edit: Include() seems to be working when i do the following: var questions = db.Questions.Include("QuestionType").Select(q => q); When I predicate on a separate entity Include seems to fail. Reply Vincent Ottens says: March 21, 2011 at 4:38 am Hi Alex, Create post, it helped me a lot!

Entity Framework 6 Include Not Working

CSS: text-decoration unable to remove overline Can leaked nude pictures damage one's academic career? Ideally I'd like to be able to map several entities against the sproc results and return the references that I know I need but obviously that isn't possible (although at present Thus the Include() is no longer applicable, in a SILENT way!

  1. Product Each product belongs to a brand, and has a one-to-many relationship with StockInformation StockInformation This class holds information about whether or not a product is in stock.
  2. Using transistor as switch, why is load always on the collector Dealing With Dragonslayers How do I deal with my current employer not respecting my decision to leave?
  3. My Problem is that i have ORDER Entity Type and ORDERDETAILS Entity Type.
  4. Edit: It does not throw a null reference exception when I have Lazy Loading turned on.
  5. This shouldn't be any problem with your model (on the contrary, I'd say).

is not null). Why? share|improve this answer answered Jan 7 '14 at 12:52 Oliver Müller 362416 singleton contexts are dangerous!! Entity Framework Include Example Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Include not working with join entities up vote 0 down vote favorite As example I have following entities (many-to-many, I also removed

Is there any point in ultra-high ISO for DSLR [not film]? Entity Framework Include Null I'm really starting to wonder... Do you still gain the magical benefits of a shield when wearing but not wielding it? The example I was working on is: var theRelease = from release in context.Releases where release.Name == "Hello World" select release; var allProductionVersions = from prodVer in context.ProductionVersions where prodVer.Status ==

For test 3 and test 4, many simple select is more efficient than My Include. Entity Framework Dbset Include In the first case all the clauses produce such interim ObjectQuery instances.   The JOIN in the second case produces an ObjectQuery. Can leaked nude pictures damage one's academic career? This works just fine, because between when the include is applied and the end of the query the shape remains the same.

Entity Framework Include Null

Wrong way on a bike lane? Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Entity Framework Include() is not working within complex query up vote 3 down vote favorite 1 Consider following LINQ query: var item Entity Framework 6 Include Not Working It's better to start the query with Recipe: return _dbContext.Recipes .Where(rcp => rcp.BuffetRecipes.Any(br => br.BuffetId == buffetId)) .Include(rcp => rcp.Category) .ToList(); You see that I took the liberty to add a Entity Framework Include Lambda Not Working Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Entity Framework Include() is not working up vote 25 down vote favorite 6 I have the following EF query: TestEntities db =

This is pretty poor and the performance is going to get worse and worse : using (BaseEntityConnection BaseEntityContext = new BaseEntityConnection()) { List entities = BaseEntityContext.GetProjectTMEByStoreID(storeOrgLevelId, startDate, endDate).ToList(); foreach (Project_TME entity http://tubemuse.com/entity-framework/entity-framework-insert-not-working.html Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website 4 + = 13 Search for: Categories 10369 (6) 10499 (1) 10500 (5) 10511 (17) 10550 (4) 11417 (2) 11731 (1) Pick Randomly Between -1 or 1 How to plot a simple circle in LaTeX What power do I have as a driver if my interstate route is blocked by a protest? When the first example is translated into a querythe columns that areselected remain the same from start to end. Entity Framework Include Not Working Child Object

Not the answer you're looking for? Your BuffetRecipe class will be created as a table you don't need in C# to manage that many to many relationship. –krillgar Nov 2 at 13:05 1 In EF core if i execute the same query in parallel subsequent calls work, but not the first one. weblink In my WPF Window, I have three DataGrids, all databound to my three classes.

This was an excellent post! Entity Framework Include Multiple Levels share|improve this answer answered Apr 18 '15 at 2:24 parliament 6,7931480141 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign Why is looping over find's output bad practice?

still trying to figure it out. –Sonic Soul Oct 30 '15 at 17:34 add a comment| up vote 16 down vote Add "System.Data.Entity" and you will be able to call Include

Because the query has been rewritten to avoid changing the shape, from the time the Include() is applieduntil the end. For example, if "entity" add a property called Member with the cardinality of 1 and Member had a property called Items with a cardinality of many, you could do this: from If not, the problem is not likely in the .Include() syntax, but rather in the data (where associated Property records might be missing, for example...). –Tomas Lycken Apr 27 '09 at Iqueryable Include How can I ensure my Playstation 2 will last a long time?

Build me a brick wall! This seems pretty stupid to me and is a major missing "feature". You should be using this instead of the join. check over here Thanks for the pointer comment!